Al Gore is an idiot

A new study out of Germany casts further doubt on the so-called global warming “consensus” by suggesting the atmosphere may be less sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide emissions than most scientists think.

A study by scientists at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Meteorology found that man-made aerosols had a much smaller cooling effect on the atmosphere during the 20th Century than was previously thought. Why is this big news? It means increases in carbon dioxide emissions likely cause less warming than most climate models suggest.

What do aerosols have to do with anything? Well, aerosols are created from human activities like burning coal, driving cars or from fires. There are also natural aerosols like clouds and fog. Aerosols tend toreflect solar energy back into space, giving them a cooling effect that somewhat offsets warming from increased CO2 emissions.

The Max Planck study suggests “that aerosol radiative forcing is less negative and more certain than is commonly believed.” In layman’s terms, aerosols are offsetting less global warming than was previously thought. And if aerosols aren’t causing as much cooling, it must mean carbon dioxide must be causing less warming than climate models predict.

“Going forward we should expect less warming from future greenhouse gas emissions than climate models are projecting,” write climate scientists Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger with the libertarian Cato Institute, adding that this study could be a “death blow” to global warming hysteria.

Independent climate researcher Nick Lewis put out a study last year with Georgia Tech’s Dr. Judith Curry that found that the climate’s response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels — a measurement called “climate sensitivity” was 1.64 degrees Celsius.

Lewis revised his findings based on the Max Planck aerosol study and found something astounding: climate sensitivity drops dramatically. Lewis also looked at climate sensitivity estimates given by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — often regarded as the world’s top authority on global warming.

The IPCC’s latest assessment put climate sensitivity between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees Celsius. The IPCC says that despite “the large uncertainty range, there is a high confidence that aerosols have offset a substantial portion of [greenhouse gas] global mean forcing.”

Basically, the IPCC says aerosols deflect a lot of warming — the opposite of the Max Planck study’s finding.

But incorporating the results from the Max Planck study dramatically reduces the upper bound estimate of climate sensitivity from 4.5 degrees to 1.8 degrees Celsius.

To put this into perspective, atmospheric concentrations of CO2 currently stand at around 400 parts per million, if this were to double, according to the IPCC’s estimates temperatures could rise as high as 4.5 degrees Celsius.

But incorporate the Max Planck study results and warming would only be as high as 1.8 degrees Celsius — less than half what the IPCC originally predicted.

Michaels and Knappenberger say Lewis’s findings basically eliminate “the possibility of catastrophic climate change—that is, climate change that proceeds at a rate that exceeds our ability to keep up.”

“Such a result will also necessarily drive down estimates of social cost of carbon thereby undermining a key argument use by federal agencies to support increasingly burdensome regulations which seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” write Michaels and Knappenberger.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 Like Rare Politics on Facebook

700-FOOT WAVES ~ 400 MPH WINDS

ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 440

Henry Kroll, this news is from Jonathan Gray -
www.beforeus.com   You authorized this mailing
when you requested your free report on our web-site or a friend enrolled you. See below for removal directions.

Josephine was breathing down my neck. "What on earth is that?" she asked. So - WHAT IS IT?

"Sit down," I said. "This is going to blow your mind!"

She took a seat and leaned forward..

"Would you believe, this is a Chinese world map drawn in 1418. Look, this Liu Gang map shows every one of the seven continents - and even Antarctica."

She leaned forward, excitedly. "And also the two main islands of New Zealand. Clearly marked."

I looked her in the eye. "You know what this will do to history as taught in our schools?"

"Sure," she smiled. "We were taught that the first visitor to this part of the world was Abel Tasman the Dutchman in 1642, followed by Britain's Captain James Cook in 1769."

"Well, Josephine, here's clear evidence that the Chinese were here first." "Or other explorers who gave them the map."

USING THIS AMAZING MAP

And so, with this map already in their possession, a massive fleet under the command of Admiral Zheng left China in 1421 to circumnavigate the globe.

The plan was also to open up further trade routes and to bring the might and power of China to the attention of the world.

More than 100 ships carrying 28,000 people set out. The flotilla was split into four smaller fleets. Very few ships made the return journey to China in 1423. The losses were considerable, one fleet alone losing 55 ships.

VISIT TO REMOTE OUTPOSTS

One of these disastrous journeys was into the southern oceans to observe the Southern Cross and to visit the Chinese outposts established on the South Island of New Zealand many years before.

The Chinese had been mining gold along the rivers of the South Island for a number of centuries. Of course, this very suggestion has raised the ire of historians. They say there is no evidence or traces that the Chinese were ever there, let alone mining precious metals.

“COMET” DISTURBS FLEET

However, documents from ancient China tell of the misfortune that befell the Southern fleets as the ships set sail from Campbell Island toward the southern tip of the South Island.

The fleet, under the command of Zhou Man, was soon to pass Snare's Island and had to alter course to avoid the island, and therefore split into two groups. Then catastrophe struck. A huge comet struck the sea less than 100 miles from the fleet (a distance of approximately 150 miles south west of Stewart Island).

SHIPS INCINERATED

Many of the ships were incinerated and the blazing wrecks were carried by a massive tsunami toward the coast of New Zealand, and at a far greater distance, the Australian coastline.

RECENT INVESTIGATION

Seeking confirmation that this Chinese report might be actually true, Dr Edward Bryant, and Australian scientist, came to the conclusion that parts of New Zealand’s South Island had been devastated by fire and hit by a tsunami between 1410 and 1480 AD.

He also researched Maori (NZ) and Aboriginal (Australia) stories of fire that rained onto the earth, destroying the forests and making the landscape uninhabitable.

Then in 2003, American scientist Dallas Abbott announced that her team had found where a comet had crashed between Campbell Island and Stewart Island.

The ocean floor crater has been measured at 20 km wide. Dallas Abbott placed the event at approximately 500 years ago.

Evidence of tsunami related flotsam has been found in the form of logs and beach sand at 220 meters above sea level on Stewart Island.

Waves of up to 130 meters high also struck the coast of Australia. The impact had a devastating effect on the Chinese fleet.

The comet would have appeared 26 times brighter than the sun; its screaming noise of 100 decibels. The sailors would have been deafened and their sight lost in the searing heat.

The comet hit the water at about 60 miles south of the fleet. Gigantic waves more than 700 feet high would have tossed the fleet like matchsticks.

The wind force would have exceeded 400 miles per hour.

Cedric Bell, a retired Marine Engineer and Surveyor, came from the UK to New Zealand to join his son Dave in carrying out extensive high-tech surveys on coastal areas from the Catlins, to Dunedin and then to Banks Peninsula.

The team established the exact locations of 60 wrecked ships, some of them many meters above sea level and embedded in banks or buried in grass paddocks on the top of cliffs. The Bells have also found evidence of dwellings and smelters in the region.

Stories from both the Koori people of Australia and the Southern Maori of New Zealand (the Waitaha) tell of a rain of fire from the heavens.

The Waitaha stories tell of the devastation with the burning of major forests and all bird life.

The people had to flee inland to escape the cataclysm, which left a landscape that had changed
beyond all recognition. All of this took place about 500 years ago.

So, here we have stories of the disaster from three different sources - Australia, New Zealand and China.

The physical evidence confirms ancient reports which mainstream educators want to deny. The very
suggestion of early visits to the South by the Chinese or others is scoffed at as "myth".

Fiction couldn't challenge your imagination more. And yet here it is, fact after fact, story after
story, about the lives and discoveries of people ages ago.

Dead men do tell tales, you see. Tales of journeys long forgotten.

Oh, and that hardly begins our great adventure. If you really want to know more, you really do need
your own copy of the popular e-book, Dead Men's Secrets. It contains one thousand or more astonishing
secrets from our forgotten past.

Here's where to go: http://www.beforeus.com

Thank you, again, Henry Kroll, for taking time to think about this. Your life will be enriched for
the effort.

Take care,
Jonathan Gray
info@archaeologyanswers.com

---------------------------------------------
Please tell your friends
---------------------------------------------
Did you enjoy this information?

If you know someone who would find these facts interesting, Click the URL below now
to email it to them, or copy and paste the URL below into your browser.
http://www.beforeus.com
You are welcome to put it on your own website exactly as it is, without change, including our email address.
====================

All blogs banned, internet censor bill, social networking banned

Internet Takeover Bill

United States Justice Foundation

932 "D" Street, Suite 2

Ramona, California 92065

760-788-6624   USJF.NET

01/10/2012

Dear Kenneth,

The final U. S. Senate vote on the internet takeover bill is set for January 24th.  As of right now, that bill, which gives U. S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power of an "Internet Czar,” WILL PASS.

Please send faxes to every Member of the U.S. Senate, and demand that they filibuster S. 968, the Senate version of the internet takeover bill.

Unfortunately, the American people are not paying attention to this catastrophe that is unfolding in the U. S. Senate.  We only have a few days to stop this unconstitutional power grab.  We must bombard the Senate with faxes, RIGHT NOW!

This bill will give corrupt U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power to blacklist or shut down any website or forum that is merely accused of being linked to "online piracy”.

He will even have the authority to "sanitize” the results of internet searches on Google or Yahoo, so that only government-approved websites and information can be found online.

If this bill passes, Barack Hussein Obama will have to the ability to ban the campaign websites of his opponents, shut down the online activities of anti-Obama groups like USJF, and harass tea party forums and any other website that don't support him.

Please fax the U. S. Senate now.  This bill WILL PASS unless the American people overwhelm the Senate with faxes!

And, while you are at it, please forward this email to everyone in your lists.

The FINAL U. S. Senate vote is scheduled for January 24th.  We don't have much time!

If this bill passes, the Obama Administration won't need a court order.  There will be no hearings or trials.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., will seize incredible control over the internet, and we will be nearly powerless to stop him.

Although supporters of the bill say that it is designed to prevent online piracy, this is an internet takeover bill, pure and simple.

Just one "complaint” from a liberal activist, or a government agent, that you are indirectly violating an obscure copyright rule, and your website could be fined huge sums, and it could be blacklisted from the internet.

Just imagine if Google was prohibited from displaying websites that were critical of Barack Obama, that discussed the controversy over where he was born, or that mentioned the damage that his policies are doing to the economy.

Well, that is exactly what will ultimately happen if S.968 passes, and it is signed into law.

Many of this bill's provisions are modeled on Communist China's censorship law, called the "Great Firewall of China.”

Even the socialists in the European Parliament oppose this new American law.

That is how extreme S.968 is!

S.968 already has 40 co-sponsors in the U.S. Senate.   Eleven more votes and it passes!

Please fax every U. S. Senator NOW.

Extreme liberals like Chuck Schumer and Al Franken have teamed up with Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham to ram this bill into law.

They are being helped by millions of dollars in campaign contributions from  left-wing mainstream media companies.

They want the government to shut down all the blogs and political forums, and all of the independent news sites, so that they, once again, will have a monopoly on the news that you and I are allowed to see.

This threat against free speech is so grave and so imminent that websites like Google and Yahoo are seriously considering staging a last-ditch online protest to try to stop Mr. Obama and his Congressional allies!

Please, fax every Member of the U. S. Senate NOW, and please forward this email to all of your friends, urging them to do the same.

This bill WILL PASS unless you take action TODAY.

And, while you are at it, please add to the effectiveness of your faxes by personally calling your U.S. Senators' offices at 202-224-3121.  Tell him, or her, to STOP S. 968, the internet takeover bill.

The final vote is January 24th.  We only have days remaining to save free speech on the internet!

Sincerely,

Gary G. Kreep, Esq.

Executive Director

United States Justice Foundation

Globalist Depopulation Agenda

False Flag BP oil disaster

Goldman Sachs sold 44% of its BP stock during the first quarter of this year which lost 36% of it value of 96-million dollars.

Goldman Sachs invested the money in Nelco, the manufacturer of corexit the toxic oil dispersant which evaporates and degrades into arsenic causing arsenic rain on land into people’s drinking water. Nelco hired another Globalst, the CEO of Monsanto to run the company.

Haliburton acquired the cleanup company Boots and Coots on site days before the explosion on BP’s Deep Water Horrizon.

BP reports cite undocumented tampering with well sealing equipment. BP’s testimony briefing also notes that the Hydraulic Control System on equipment designed to automatically seal the well in an emergency was modified without their knowledge some time before the explosion.

The disaster is not so much a spill but a colossal underwater volcanic eruption spewing out 2.5 million gallons of crude oil a day. This has been going on for more than 45 days with an absolute media blackout of the real situation. This could take years to cleanup. Compared to the EXXON Valdez Tanker which official state records say spilled spilled 11-million gallons. (Actually it was more like 22-million gallons because the three smaller tankers that went along side to pump out the Exxon Valdez took off much seawater along with the oil that was leaking into the ship. The state of Alaska was paid 900-million dollars within months while the people affected had to wait over twenty years.) If anyone is interested I can send you a copy of the actual tanker literage reports for $20.00. www.GuardDogBooks.com

Meanwhile there is the real possibility of volcanic tsunamis, superstorms and toxic gas release. The entire state of Florida, most of which is only 50-feet above sea level could be wiped out. Maybe this explains the stockpiling of 500,000 coffins in Georgia last year and the FEMA stockpiling of thousands of UN evacuation vehicles at a Air Force Base in Jacksonville.

One thing is for sure. We need to use this event to shake off lethargy and apathy. There are some wicked plans being carried out right now to destroy the middle class, depopulate the earth and reduce us to a small group of controllers that have the resources and power and the few of us that are left will work as slaves.

This doesn’t’ have to happen. We all need to raise our awareness and consciously choose what we believe and how we act. It requires all citizens on earth to become responsible and spiritually mature. This also means getting off the planet to colonize other biospheres.

THE REAL COST OF NUCLEAR ENERGY

THE REAL COST OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
WHAT THE GOVERNMENT WON’T TELL YOU

False global warming propaganda leaked to the media for societal manipulation has increased the public’s opposition increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The public seems oblivious to the fact that global warming has been proven to be a myth and that both polar ice caps are building ice and polar bears are not drowning.

They lied about carbon dioxide being greenhouse gas because it amounts to only .033 percent of our atmosphere. It is a trace gas necessary for plant growth. Without it you won’t eat. If humans were some how able to double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere it would still be a trace gas at .033 percent.

The polar ice caps are building. I don’t have time to put it here but the earth is heating up underneath due to more volcanic activity. Thorium, radium, plutonium and uranium at the core keep the interior of the earth hot. There is something strange going on with interactive gravity waves being transmitted from star to star as we enter the galactic plane where billions of stars line up.

Meanwhile to counter the mythical GW the government has offered up to $8-billion in subsidies and insurance against delays in licensing nuclear facilities. Additionally they have offered another $18-billion in loan guarantees to build new nuclear plants.

Our government spent $8-billion studying the Yucca mountain Nevada storage facility and that figure does not include that actual construction costs. It is still not ready. The projected opening of the Yucca Mountain, Nevada storage facility is projected to open in 2017—two decades behind schedule.

Meanwhile nuclear reactors around the country have been storing spent fuel rods in cooling pool and above ground cement canisters costing $1-million each. Each canister holds 10 tons of waste (20,000 pounds) and the average 1,000 megawatt reactor discharges enough spent fuel to fill two canisters ever year. Total cost two million dollars per year. The US nuclear utilities are suing the federal government, because they would not have incurred such expenses has the U. S. Department of Energy has opened the Yucca Mountain repository in 1998 as originally planned. As a result the government is paying for the cement canisters and associated infrastructure and operations—a bill that is running about $300-million a year.

Under pressure to remove spent fuel off the sites, the Department of Energy has returned to an idea that it abandoned in the 1970’s—to “reprocess” the spent fuel. Up to 70 percent of the plutonium still remains in the spent fuel rods but the process of extracting it is horrible dangerous.

Vast reprocessing plants have been running in France and the U. K. for more than a decade. Japan began to operate its own reprocessing facility in 2006. The idea is not without its merits however it is expensive and dangerous.

Nuclear fuel is the element from Hell. It power reactors generating heat—which makes steam to turn electricity generating turbines maintaining a nuclear chain reaction that splits atoms. As a rule most of the fuel is uranium that is enriched so that 4 to 5 percent is the chain-reacting isotope uranium 235. Virtually all the rest is uranium 238. At an enrichment of only 5 percent stolen reactor fuel cannot be used to construct an illicit atom bomb.

In the reactor, some of the uranium 238 absorbs a neutron and becomes plutonium 239, which is also chain reacting and can in principle be partially “burned” it is extracted and properly prepared. However the process is expensive and costs more than what the fuel is worth.

Recycling the plutonium reduces the waste problem only minimally. Most important, the separated plutonium can readily serve to make nuclear bombs and much effort and money is spent keeping it secure until it is once more a part of spent fuel. A small amount of this highly radioactive—too small to make a nuclear bomb can be used to make a dirty bomb. Simply wrap it with explosives and detonate over a populated area. The resultant microscopic dust particles breathed into the lungs guarantees a slow death from cancer.

France is using reprocessing to move its storage problem of spent fuel from the reactor sites to the reprocessing plant. Japan is following France’s example. The U. K. and Russia is simply storing their separated ‘civilian’ plutonium—about 120 tons between them as of 2005, enough to make 15,000 atoms bombs. For a while the U. S. was shipping all their spent fuel rods to Russia and France.

The economic reality of the situation took a while to sink in, but it has now convinced almost all nations that bought foreign reprocessing services that they might as well store their spent fuel and save the reprocessing fee of about $1 million per ton (10 times the cost of dry storage containers).

So France, Russia and the U. K. have lost virtually all their foreign customers. One result is the U. K. plans to shut down it reprocessing plants within the next few years, a move that comes with a $92-billion price tag for cleaning up the site of these facilities.

In 2000 France considered the option of ending reprocessing in 2010 and concluded that doing so would reduce the cost of nuclear electricity. (France gets 70 percent of it energy from nuclear power plants.) Making such a change, though, might also engender acrimonious debates about nuclear waste—the last thing the French nuclear establishment wants in a country that has seen relatively little antinuclear activism.

Japan is even more politically locked into reprocessing its nuclear waste. Unlike the U. S. Japan has been unable to obtain permission to expand their on-site storage. Russia today has just one single processing plant with the ability to handle only 15 percent of it total production. The Soviets wanted to expand their processing capability but had to abandon those plans when their economy collapsed in the 1980s.

During the Cold War the U. S. operated reprocessing plants in Washington State and South Carolina to recover plutonium for nuclear weapons. More than half the 100 tons of plutonium that was separated in those efforts has been declared to be in excess of our national needs, and the DOE currently projects that disposing of it will cost more than $15-billion.

The people who were working on the sites where this reprocessing took place are now primarily occupied with cleaning up the resulting mess, which is expected to cost around $100 billion. In a situation where the county is threatened be it real or imaginary the attitude is, “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.” Obviously our government has little or no foresight when it comes to nuclear waste or caring for the welfare of its citizens future.

With all the problems reprocessing involves one might ask why it was pursued at all. Part of the answer is that fore years after civilian nuclear power plants were first introduced, the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) promoted reprocessing both domestically and abroad as essential to the future of nuclear power, because the industry was worried about running out of uranium. This concern has since abated.

In 1974 India, one of the countries that the U. S. assisted in acquiring reprocessing capabilities (How many countries?) used its first separated plutonium to build a nuclear weapon. About this time Theodore B. Taylor, a former U. S. nuclear weapons designer, was raising an alarm about the possibility that the panned separation and recycling of thousands of tons of plutonium every year would allow terrorists to steal enough to make one or more atomic bombs. Since that time concerns about a much simpler device using the poisonous waste material in the form of a “dirty bomb.”

The U. S. National Academy of Science panel concluded that recycling the transuranics in the first 62.000 tons of spent fuel, (the amount that otherwise would have been stored in Yucca Mountain) would require, “no less than $50-billion and easily could be over $100 billion”—in other words, it could well cost something like $500 for every person in the U. S. These numbers would have to be doubled to deal with the entire amount of spent fuel that existing U. S. reactors are expected to discharge during their lifetimes.” –May 2008 Scientific American page 91.

Now that we know a little about the history of the nuclear power fiasco we can get a glimpse into the bureaucratic mindset that put us in this situation.

Our government big plan was to ship all its nuclear waste to reprocessing facilities in India and other third-world nations that the AEC had secretly bankrolled and constructed at a cost of several billion each. This was done so they wouldn’t have to deal with the political opposition and Congressional oversight problem in this country. Sound familiar? Ship all the jobs overseas to put Americans out of work because life and labor is cheaper in third-world nations. Who cares if a few lowly-paid, dark-skinned people die from radiation poisoning? Their big plan backfired when India detonated their first underground nuclear explosion.

The Scientific American article goes on to say: “Before this danger was fully realized, the U. S. shared technology for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel with other countries but ceased doing so after India detonated a nuclear bomb...” It is clear that our government’s intentions from the onset has been to spread as much of this nuclear material as possible all over the globe thereby increase the threat of nuclear war and giving them the excuse to take more of our tax money. To learn more read my book, The Frog is Cooked
www.AlaskaPublishing.com and www.GuardDogBooks.com

The Moon is owned by the Anunnaki and is Nibiru.

The Anunnaki own the Moon and it is Nibiru
NOMOON UNTIL 12,713 YEARS AGO
Giordano Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57): “There are those who have believed that there was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed to be younger than the sun, was not yet created. The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po, are believed to have been in existence before it (the moon).” “Theodorus writes in his first book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought by Hercules against the giants. Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works, confirm the same.” “Mnaseas said that the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’; meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1]
Bruno goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly animal and even mortal, although divine. Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed, and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1] [emphasis added]
Velikovsky has discussed this same idea by noting that one of the most remote recollections of mankind is in regard to the period of Earth’s history when it was Moonless. Velikovsky quotes everyone from Democritus and Anaxagoras to Aristotle and Apollonius of Rhodes to show that such a pre-Hellenic time existed. Those humans living at the time were called Pelasgians, Proselenes (“before the Moon”), and Arcadians (pre-Danai and pre-Deukalion). They were said to have dwelt in the mountains, fed on acorns, and lived as aborigines. [See below.]
Plutarch, Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and were older than the Moon. There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted. Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”
The references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy. While Velikovsky and those scholars suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred after the time of some of Earth’s original aborigines. In fact, the time of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the planet, dwelling in mountains, eating acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines. The possible assumption that the Arcadians were a civilization is without confirming evidence. In addition, the habit of Sumerians to consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal one. Meanwhile, all the histories tie together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position.
Given the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial. In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home (including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans) even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.
Is it possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential? Is this their “home away from home”, from which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a privacy from prying human eyes? Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the Moon! And yet it makes total sense.
Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location. The fact that Adam may have been preaching a worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the location of his acknowledged creators.
Richard Hoagland has suggested that the distinct differences between the near and far sides of the Moon may be the result of interplanetary (or interstellar) war damages -- one side being blasted into “seas”, while the far side has no such, similar “damage”! There is also the War of the Titans, and all sorts of warfare going on among the Anunnaki, especially Enki and Enlil, in the earlier times.
The reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago taking Earth out of the Ice Age.
It might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations. It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon. Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.
Furthermore, an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet Earth. The Moon could even be where Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University. [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or if the admission requirements are really tough. A rampant curiosity might be important.]
When the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space. The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.
Bringing the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice Ages.
My co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms, an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is five kilometers deep above Alaska. The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes, horses, camels and mastodons in North America at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space behind the Moon.
There is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)
Finally, while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as superior beings. That may also be why they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship. Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs. To talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com and www.GuardDogBooks.com

NO GW/GC Earth is currently in an ice age.

There is no global warming or global cooling. There is no global warming or cooling. If you take a look at the Antarctic ice core graphs can see a history of earth temperature, Co2, methane, and dust dating back about three million years. There is one graph of benethic carbonate (carbon deposition on the sea floor) dating back 6-million years. Increased carbon deposition is an indication of increased light to Earth to cause plants to grow in the oceans.

Early Earth had a 750 PSI atmosphere. It was also in the Heronian Glaciation over one billion years. Such an atmosphere would extend over 2,500 feet above the Earth's surface. There was no way sunlight could break through such an atmosphere to thaw out the mile-deep sheets of ice over the oceans and get life started. Our Sun drifted near the ancient Procyon and Sirius multiple-star systems.

It was the additional light and heat from Sirius A and B that took Earth out of the billion-year Heronian Glaciation. Earth has lost over98% of its atmosphere. It was laid down as coal, oil and limestone from the invisible UV light from Sirius B in the 350 to 400 nanometer range. During this 650-million-year warm period Earth did not have ice caps. Then, about 2.5 million years ago an explosion in Orion caused our sun to loose its tractor beam with Sirius B and started making ellipses around this star system. The ellipses steadily grew to now we go out to nine light years and Ice Ages last 105,000 years.

We are now 8.5 light years from Sirius and heading toward it at 7.5 kilometers per second. Back Cover Text: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES God gave us a brain and if we refuse to use it he will be greatly disappointed. The authors solve the greatest mystery of all time by plotted our sun’s course from its birthplace in Orion. Little Sirius B with 1.5 times the gravity of our sun grabbed hold of us putting us into orbit around Sirius A. Our sun’s fortunate capture by the Sirius system took Earth out of a billion-year Ice Age with additional light and heat.

It took the power of a white dwarf putting out hundreds of times more UV than our sun to break through early Earth’s 1400 PSI C02 atmosphere and get life started on the surface of the waters. The invention of non-cyclic photosynthesis created eight times more food production that allowed predators to exist and gave us our free oxygen coal, oil and limestone made from carbon dioxide (Co2). Global warming is a hoax. Our sun doesn’t have enough power to keep us out of Ice Ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! We are in an Ice Age! During all previous geologic ages when the majority of the coal, oil and limestone were made from Co2 Earth’s average temperature was 50 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The average temperature on Earth is now 32 degrees.

A stellar explosion three million years ago blasted our sun into an elliptical orbit where we go out to nine light years below the galactic plane. Co2 is plant food! Without Co2 everything on the planet dies and you can’t grow food. Our atmosphere is depleted to .033 % Co2 and our government wants to take your tax dollars to pump it underground???? Given the fact that 90% of our atmosphere is gone and that the major producer of free oxygen “diatoms” are disappearing; will stupid humans keep on burning things? We need to get a handle on this and start using sources of energy that don’t consume oxygen like geothermal, solar, wind and tide. This book is about the conscious enlightenment of humanity necessary to save itself from extinction.

www.alaskapublishing.com

GW/GC RELIGIOUS FREAKS IGNORE BASIC FACTS: EARTH IS AN ICE AGE WITH AN AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF 32 DEGREES. The comments I get refuting basic logic that is available to all is evidence that something is wrong with the curriculums. Much of what we are taught was engineered for societal manipulation to keep us focused on the wrong things such as GW and GC.

I find it amusing when I get feedback about trees not growing above a certain level because there isn't enough Co2 plant food. Where do you think the carbon come from that makes carbon based life forms like THE SHEETROCK ON THE WALL? GW/GC nuts refuse to look up the facts. Co2 is plant food! Without Co2 the planet dies and you will starve to death. Co2 is a trace gas! It accounts for only .033% of our atmosphere.

If mankind were to some how able to double the amount of Co2 it would still be a trace gas at .066%. Co2 is also heavy. It is twice as heavy as oxygen and about 1/3 heavier than nitrogen so human release of Co2 is partially responsible for smog around cities because it tends to hang below the 3000-foot level until the wind mixes it up. Check out the specific gravity of Co2 compared with nitrogen and oxygen to verify this fact! Because Co2 is heavy, trees don't grow above a certain level because there isn't enough Co2 food for them to grow.. That is why there is a timberline duhh! Co2 is an extremely valuable resource. You got two oxygen atoms and one carbon atom. If you were smart you could burn it in your car or heat your home with it! The sheetrock on the wall of your house was made from Co2 using UV light from space.

The coal that heats your house and gives you electricity was made from Co2 using invisible UV light from space in the invisible 350 to 400 nanometer range. The oil and makes your car go down the road was made from Co2 and hydrogen. If anyone is interested where the energy came from to make our carbon resources read my book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES or if you have no interest in where the free oxygen came from you are currently sucking into your lungs you can go on my web site and order a book about Sarah Palin or books about Barack Obama or John McCain all of which will not alter human release of Co2 in any way. Now methane! That's another story.

www.GuardDogBooks.com www.HankKroll.com also: www.AlaskaPublishing.com

Bogus GW/GC Earth is in an Ice Age

Al Gore made millions sellling phoney carbon credits. he money was supposed to be used to plant trees and other things that mop up CO2.

Check out the Al-stars video on the ‘new’ geology of the earth! This is the guy who is leading down the ‘global warming’ road!

Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'

And yet he's STILL one of the liberal's top 'authorities' . . . facts don't matter, as long as you're appropriately liberal in your message . . . Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'

By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
November 18, 2009 - 10:27 ET

For several years as uneducated sycophants in the media gushed and fawned over every utterance from former Vice President Al Gore, News Busters has informed readers of just how absurd the junk science he's peddling really is.
Last Thursday, NBC "Tonight Show" viewers got a perfect example of how the Nobel Laureate basically makes things up, and that his poor grades in college were quite an indicator of just how little he understands about science.

So egregious was his departure from reality that the following clip should be mandatory viewing for all his fans in the media who seem to be just as scientifically-challenged (video embedded below the fold with partial transcript,

Hot Air):
CONAN O'BRIEN, HOST: Now, what about ... you talk in the book about geothermal energy...
AL GORE, NOBEL LAUREATE: Yeah, yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...and that is, as I understand it, using the heat that's generated from the core of the earth ...
GORE: Yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...to create energy, and it sounds to me like an evil plan by Lex Luthor to defeat Superman. Can you, can you tell me, is this a viable solution, geothermal energy?
GORE: It definitely is, and it's a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot ...

On Tuesday, National Review's John Derbyshire noted:
The geothermal gradient is usually quoted as 25-50 degrees Celsius per mile of depth in normal terrain (not, e.g., in the crater of Kilauea). Two kilometers down, therefore, (that's a mile and a quarter if you're not as science-y as Al) you'll have an average gain of 30-60 degrees - exploitable for things like home heating, though not hot enough to make a nice pot of tea. The temperature at the earth's core, 4,000 miles down, is usually quoted as 5,000 degrees Celsius, though these guys claim it's much less, while some contrarian geophysicists have posted claims up to 9,000 degrees. The temperature at the surface of the Sun is around 6,000 degrees Celsius, while at the center, where nuclear fusion is going on bigtime, things get up over 10 million degrees.

If the temperature anywhere inside the earth was "several million degrees," we'd be a star.
The physics and astronomy website Physlink also contests Gore's absurd claim:
It is approximately 4000°C at the centre of the Earth. To put this in context:
1. The centre of the Sun is approximately 15 million°C
2. The surface of the Sun is 5500°C
3. Iron melts at 1535°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
4. Water boils at 100°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
5. Human skin is comfortable with temperatures up to about 60°C
6. The highest temperature recorded on the Earth's surface is 58°C (Libya 1922)

It is not possible to directly measure the temperature at the centre of the Earth and four thousand degrees is nothing more than our most well-established piece of guesswork to date. Most modern calculations rely on the fact that we believe the inner core to be made up of iron and nickel that is just about at melting point. It is under a lot of pressure, which prevents it from melting, even at such high temperatures. There is also a lot of evidence regarding how the outer core of the Earth convects and that helps to establish the temperature. However, recently British scientists have suggested that the temperature of the Earth's core may in fact be as high as the surface of the Sun, so the question is still open.


As such, whether it's 4,000 or 6,000 degrees, Gore's claim of "several million" is absurdly preposterous and not based on ANY scientific fact.
As Ed Morrissey observed Wednesday:
[A]nyone who followed the controversy over Gore's piece of cinematic fantasy An Inconvenient Truth knows that Gore tells a lot of very convenient untruths in his quest to create a market for his carbon-trading company. However, this is just flat-out ignorance that with any other person in any other context would destroy their credibility. This is worse than Tom Cruise telling Matt Lauer that he can debunk the entire psychiatric field because he's read a few books. If Gore can't get this rather basic fact right, why should he be believed on anything else in the energy field?
This raises an obvious question: in a world where media fact-check a comedy skit and a book written by a former governor, shouldn't they equally scrutinize statements being made by a man who's actively pushing for the passage of economically impactful legislation currently before Congress?

Or is that asking too much from so-called journalists?
Consider that if Gore was a Republican, his numerous departures from fact would have so discredited him years ago that he would now be considered a total joke.By contrast, because he's a Democrat who preaches liberal gospel, he can say whatever he wants without any regard for its accuracy and not only receive media's praise for his inexcusable errance, but an Oscar and a Nobel Peace Prize to boot.
As the Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff was famous for saying years ago, "America -- what a country!"

*****Update: NewsBusters reader Eric Peterkofsky pointed out at Facebook that Newsweek recently called Gore "The Thinking Man's Thinking Man."

Greatest Mystery of All Time Solved

Cosmological Ice Ages
by Henry Kroll 384 pages 8.5 by 11; quality trade paperback (softcover); Catalog #08-0164; ISBN 1-4251-7062-5; US$31.35, C$31.35, EUR21.42, £16.19
About the Book
I plotted our sun’s course through space to discover that our sun was born in the constellation Orion. After the planets were formed Earth was covered with a five-mile-thick coating of ice one billion years. We eventually drifted near the Sirius multiple star system and little Sirius B (1.5 solar masses) grabbed hold of our sun putting it in orbit around Sirius A.

The Horse Head nebuls is located in Orion--possible birthplace of our sun....................................................

Sirius B is the only object in the neighborhood that could possibley break through early earth's 750 PSI atmosphere to get plants to grow in the oceans and release free oxygen.

Our sun does not have enough power to keep us out of the ice ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! It was the additional light and heat from Sirius star system that melted the ice caps and got life started in the oceans.

Earth is losing its atmosphere. During the rein of the dinosaurs the atmospheric pressure was around 30 pounds per square inch. Now it is down to 14.5 pounds per square inch. Before our sun was captured by the Sirius system earth had an atmosphere of 750 pounds per square inch. Over time and it was laid down as coal, oil and limestone using photosynthesis and light from these giant stars. We have a limited time to get our act together and get off the planet to seed life in other biospheres.
http://www.guarddogbooks.com/http://www.alaskapublishing.com/

MORE JOBS LOST TO BUREAUCRACY

Henry Kroll
513 Peninsula Avenue
Kenai, Alaska 9961

3/3/09

Senator Lisa Murkowski
C/O U.S. Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

RE Protest: H. R. 699

Dear Lisa;
I usually don’t get involved in politics but given the present state of the economy this bill has to voted down!
H. R. 699 would completely wipe out all small-scale mining in the United States and Alaska. Small-scale miners do not have the time and resources to handle the fees, lawsuits and reporting requirements.
Large-scale mining would be also phased out as mining companies would be unable to deal with the unattainable requirements of these regulations, citizen lawsuits, thin profit margins, reporting requirements, and the uncertainty that comes with the federal government’s new authority to halt a mining operation when “undue degradation” is occurring or a scientific, biological, or cultural resource is discovered. Many areas that may have potential would be inaccessible.
No one in their right mind would provide funding for exploration or operations under the proposed conditions.
The most likely outcome would be that the environment would suffer as mining companies move all operations to countries with little or no regulations.
Like the current situation with oil, Americans would be forced to obtain natural resources overseas, sending money to countries that don’t like Americans and would love to control our prices.
This legislation is co-sponsored by Reps, George Miller (D-CA), Henry Waxman (D-CA), Ed Markey (D-MA), Howard Berman (D-CA) Raul Grialva (D-AZ), Rush Holt (D-N), Jim Costa (D-CA), Donna Christensen (D-VI), Pete Stark (D-CA), Dale Kildee (D-MI), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), ron Kind (D-WI), Lois Capps (D-CA), Adam Schiff (D-CA, Mike Honda (D-CA), ohn Salazar (D-CO), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), and Gerry Connolly (D-VA).
The legislators who have sponsored this bill should be labeled as un-American, voted out of office, and sent packing or attempting to decimate on of the few industries that has managed to stay afloat and provide an honest paycheck during these though economic times.
Thanks for your service,

INTERNET CENSORSHIP

INTERNET CENSORSHIP

The Australian government is set to impose Chinese-style internet censorship by enforcing a universal national filter that will block websites deemed “ controversial” as part of a wider agenda to regulate the internet.

A provision whereby Internet users could opt out of the filter y contacting their ISP has been stripped from the legislation, meaning the filter will be universally mandatory. The System Administrators Guild of Australia and the Electronic Frontiers Australia have attacked the proposal, saying it will restrict web access, raise prices and slow Internet traffic speeds. The plan was originally created as a way to combat child pornography and adult content, but could be extended to include almost any “controversial” websites.


In a display of bipartisanship by US Democrats and Republicans alike are calling for all-out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens.
In December 2006.Republican Senator John McCain tabled a proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos, and videos posted by visitors on comment boards.
The White House own declassified strategy for “winning the war on terror” targets Internet conspiracy theory sites as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to “diminish” their influence.
The US government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. Criminal charges including a possible ail term of up to one year could be the punishment for non-compliance. There goes the first amendment and free thought.
A landmark November 2006 legal case on behalf of the recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations sought to criminalize all Internet file sharing of any kind a copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the World Wide Web; its argument was supported by the US government.
A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trapdoor for the destruction of the internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other web sites is breach of copyright and piracy.
The European Union has also vowed to shut down “terrorists” who use the Internet to spread propaganda. The EU Data Retention bill, passed after much controversy and implemented in 2007, obligated telephone operators and Internet service providers to store information on who called whom and who e-mailed whom for at leas six months. Under this law investigators in any EU country, and most bizarrely even in the USA, can access EU citizens’ data on phone calls, SMSs. Emails and instant messaging services. The EU also proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license.


There goes the end of free thought. My blogs and web sites will definitely be on the “blocked” list. I am already banned from all Google groups.

Internet censorship is perhaps the most pertinent issue that freedom advocates should rally to combat over the next few years, lest we allow a cyber-gag to be placed over our mouths and say goodbye to our last medium of free and open communication. –Source: Prison Planet, 29 October 2008, www.infowars.com:80/?p=5619
And www.GuardDogBooks.com

No significan global warming since 1995.

No significant global warming since 1995
by Jarl R. Ahlbeck The writer is D.Sc. and lecturer at Abo Akademi University, Finland 25.10.2008
Keywords: Global Warming
The recovery of the earth's climate from the little ice age started about 200 years ago, but the concentration of the atmospheric carbon dioxide started to increase significantly as late as in the 1950s, probably due to rapidly increased burning of fossil fuels.
The climate recovery is still an ongoing process today. A natural warming rate of roughly 0.5 deg C /100 years has been the baseline for more than 100 years, but both short (a few years) and long (20 years) fluctuations around the baseline have occurred for natural but highly speculative reasons, for example a rapid warming in the 1930s followed by a cooling period, and recently again warming until about 1998.
According to the UK climate panel IPCC, this last warming period has been forced by increased carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. There is however no proof of that and the theory of how carbon dioxide influences the global mean temperature is complicated and unreliable. And if the global temperature again starts to increase slower than the natural long-term trend of 0.5 deg C/100 years, or even starts to cool, we can be quite certain that the recent faster warming trends have been natural too.
It has been widely discussed if the satellite-derived global temperature measurements that show only little warming should be more reliable than the temperatures obtained on the ground that show more warming. But after 1995 both sources show about the same, (see graphs below drawn from Hadley-data (ground) and satellite data (NASA)).
A good reason to start a diagram from 1995 is that since that year no big (cooling) volcano eruptions have disturbed the temperature trend. Contrary to common belief, there has been no or little global warming since 1995 and this is shown by two completely independent datasets.
The curves look very normal and it seems probable that the natural recovery from the little ice age has went on without any significant decelerations or accelerations caused by human activity.
It is impossible to say what is going to happen in the future. But so far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming.

GW nuts looking more foolish every day.

Next time you pick up a National Geographic notice how scientists working at the South Pole build building on top of twenty-foot-high pipes. This is because the ice is growing at a rate of five feet a year. They get five years out of a structure before they have to dig down to get inside. Imagine 500-feet more ice in only 100 years.

At the North Pole the ice sheets over the Arctic Ocean grew in 2007. This year 2008 a record cold summer and winter has caused them to grow even more. The real danger to the polar bear is freezing to death and the ice being too thick for the seals to create breathing holes.

Anchorage and Fairbanks Alaska both suffered through the longest 21-day cold snap in over 100 years.

Record Cold Winter Requires Even Scarier, More Draconian Response
Posted by Bill Hennessy on March 10, 2008 under Satire.

Washinton, DC — The record cold temperatures and heavy snow in Asia and North America have prompted earth scientists to invent a whole new demand: zero carbon emissions.
Citing a new generation of computer models, based on scientific speculation that only a decade ago was considered too outlandish to pull off, scientists now claim that even physical exercise is too dangerous and must be banned.
“The steam that rises from a Starbuck’s coffee contains enough greenhouse gases to kill three polar bears and wipe out a village in Sri Lanka,” said Dr. Phillip Hensen, a geophysicist with the Godlike Space Studies program at NASA. “We must eliminate all greenhouse gases by July 2008, or we might as well launch every nuclear ballistic missile in all the arsenals in the world.”
Soccer moms around the country agree, and in Town and Country, Missouri, they’re taking action.

“I put a ‘Save the Planet: Park Your Car and Walk’ bumpersticker on my Escalade,” Melinda Carson told Hennessy’s Review. “We use E84 or 85, whatever it is, gasoline because it reduces America’s dependence on foreign carbon and saves polar bears.”
Earth scientist Patti Goebels, an associate professor at Land o Lakes Community College, applauds efforts like Ms. Carson’s. “I mean, anything we can do is great. Of course, we really need Congress to ban all carbon emissions and anything that puts off heat. Otherwise, all the polar bears will die, and even Minnesota will be hot and humid.”
Asked about the record cold winter in much of North America and Asia, Hensen said it’s just more evidence of the validity of the greenhouse theory.
“You have quadrillions of molecules of greenhouse gases trapped in the atmosphere. Of course, it’s going to cause colder winters in the northern hemisphere and colder summers in the southern hemisphere. Have you ever sprayed yourself with a CO2 fire extinguisher? All the models predicted this.”

Hensen took the opportunity to attack global warming skeptics. “These people, some of whom claim to be scientists, who say ‘this is just a scare tactic to win grant money’ are actually all employed by the big oil companies. They get paid to lie about the effects of greenhouse gases by the people who hate polar bears and Sri Lanka.”
Democrat candidate for President, Barack Obama, responded quickly to the report. “I will do whatever it takes to save the polar bear. Hillary Clinton could have saved the polar bear when her husband was president. Instead, she slept with strangers in the Lincoln Bedroom for a thousand dollars a night. ” UPDATE: Better global warming satire. Calvin Dude

COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES

Hank Kroll and Brad Guth solved the greatest mystery of all time, “the meaning of life.”
Everyone needs to read this book to more fully appreciate the celebration that is life.
After our sun was born in Orion three billion years passed and the planets were formed. Tiny Earth was in an Ice Age for one billion years. Eventually we drifted between the ancient two-solar-mass, stars Sirius and Procyon. Little Sirius B that orbits Sirius A every 54 years is an object the size of the Earth with 1.5 times the gravity of our sun matched our velocity and put us in orbit around Sirius A. Our Sun’s fortunate capture by the Sirius system took Earth out of the billion-year Ice Age with additional light and heat. It took the power of a white dwarf star to break through early Earth’s 1000+ PSI atmosphere and get life started on the surface of the waters.
This is the only possible explanation for how we got here besides having God instantly create everything which is a stretch for thinking people. I am not saying he didn’t have a hand in it.
The average temperature on Earth is currently 32 degrees which means we are still in an Ice Age. At the present time our sun doesn’t have enough power to keep us out of Ice Ages let alone penetrate a 1000 PSI Co2 atmosphere to get life started! During all previous geologic ages when the majority of the coal, oil and limestone were made from Co2, Earth’s average temperature was 50 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Three million years ago the stellar explosion that created Barnard’s Loop blasted our sun into an elliptical orbit where we now go out to nine light years from Sirius below the galactic plane.
Co2 is plant food! Without Co2 everything on the planet dies and you can’t grow food. Our atmosphere is depleted to .033 % Co2 and our government wants to take your tax dollars to pump it underground????
Given the fact that 99% of our atmosphere is gone and the major producer of free oxygen, “diatoms” are disappearing; will humans keep on burning things until there is no oxygen left? We need to get a handle on this and start using sources of energy that don’t consume oxygen like geothermal, solar, wind and tide.
This book is about the conscious enlightenment of humanity necessary to save itself from extinction. www.GuardDogBooks.com www.AlaskaPublishing.com

Dire threats to human life and existence.

CHANCES OF BIG BRESTED WOMEN ON OTHER PLANETS VERY REMOTE INDEED!
Consider yourself lucky!
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar predicted while a very young man in the 1930s that there was a limiting mass for white dwarf stars: no white dwarf could be stable against gravitational collapse if it exceeded this mass, which is about 1.4—1.5 solar masses depending on detailed composition of the white dwarf. The idea was not very well received by many established astronomers, who considered it absurd that a white dwarf could have a limiting mass.

Much later Chandrasekhar’s brilliant idea was completely accepted within the astrophysics community and he eventually won a Nobel Prize for his deep theoretical contributions to astrophysics. Today all textbooks on stars describe the Chandrasekhar Limiting Mass for white dwarfs as central to the structure of white dwarfs.

We currently are traveling toward Sirius A and little Sirius B at 7.5 kilometers per second. It orbits Sirius A at 20 Earth distances (20AU) every 54 years. Its orbit is quite elliptical so from time to time it gets close enough to sucks material off from Sirius A. This is a generally accepted as fact by the astronomical community due to Sirius B’s tremendous gravity and close proximity to Sirius A.

At 1.5 solar masses and 8.5 light years distant Sirius B is quite close in size to the Chandrasekhar limit. If it were to suddenly take on enough additional mass from Sirius A we can forget all about our wordily problems as Sirius B would suddenly go neutron. That would be an event several orders of magnitude above going postal.

The Earth takes in 40,000 tons of material from space each year. How many tons per years does the Sun take in? To discover the answer you would multiply the number of Earth surface areas on the Sun times 40,000 tons. It is a big number. Could it be that the incoming material to the sun is keeping it burning hotter? Is the incoming material prolonging the life of our Sun? Yes and yes.

Sirius B being 1.4 to 1.5 solar masses is producing about 100 times more invisible ultraviolet light than our sun in the 350 to 400 nanometer range conducive to plant growth. Dropping a few metric tons of material in there would cause a burst of light several hundred times more intense than the output of our Sun. According to mainstream science when you drop a marshmallow into a neutron star it puts out the equivalent energy of both atomic bombs America dropped on Japan.

Tell the globalists to cool it with regard to exterminating human populations and re-wilding the Earth. Mother Nature will do the job for them anyway. A good sized solar flare could wipe out most of the population on Earth.

Every 27-million years 60% to 90% of all life on the planet is wiped out. David Rupp and Jack Septowski of the University of Chicago cataloged all major extinctions dating back hundreds of million of years to discover that they occur in regular cycles every 27-million years.

Their theory is that there is some kind of black body that enters our solar system disrupting the Oort cloud and asteroid belt sending meteorites in to kill us.

Another explanation is that a great pulse comes out of the center of the Galaxy at regular intervals every 27-million years. We have no idea of what a precarious situation we are in and the fact that we are alive and surviving under such circumstances is a miracle. Due to our unique situation regarding how life was nurtured by invisible light from multiple star systems and the extreme chances of a similar circumstance happening by chance it makes the possibility of intelligent life on other planets very remote indeed---especially big busted women.

Beside all of the above threats to our existence on Earth, Betelgeuse, a 1000 solar mass star is sitting there between us and Orion waiting to blow and rearrange this part of the galaxy. If such an event were to occur humans and animals would have to go underground to survive the burst of radiation.

My book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES describes the birthplace of our sun in Orion and its capture by the Sirius multiple star system that took Earth out of a billion-year Ice Age. The intense light from Sirius B is the only thing in the area that could possibly have pierced early Earth’s 1000+PSI, atmosphere to get life started. We don’t know how lucky we are—and who is to say somebody didn’t arrange it and is watching over us?
www.GuardDogBooks.com & www.AlaskaPublishing.com

How the celebration we call life got started.

HOW NONCYCLIC PHOTOSYNTHESIS JUMPSTARTED LIFE, HILLARY CLINTON AND EVERYTHING THAT FILLS A NICH.
True plants use carbon dioxide and water (along with nitrogen and phosphorus from the soil) to make organic compounds and produce oxygen as a waste product. When the plant needs to use any of the energy it stored, it uses oxygen to “burn” its fuel, generating water and carbon dioxide as byproducts of that process.
To take advantage of the energy stored in the plants, animals eat the plants directly or eat other animals that do. Like the plants, they use oxygen during metabolism and produce waste water and carbon dioxide. Both plants and animals need additional water for a variety of functions: For example, the transport of nutrients up from the roots is powered by the evaporation of water from the leaves and animals use water to regulate temperature through evaporative cooling and to dispose waste products. A small fraction of the earth’s living things are anaerobic or harvest inorganic chemical energy, and so do not fit into this cycle.

ENERGY CYCLE IN PLANTS
The photon energy: “sunlight” activates electrons, which are removed from the chlorophyll before they can reemit that energy. These “excited” electrons are used to charge a membrane battery, which is used to make the energy transfer compound, adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In the process the energized electrons, having been activated days or even years earlier, lose their energy and are discarded in energy poor carbon dioxide. The ATP is used as a carrier for the electron energy. Every organism faced nutrient poor conditions and so for every 99.9 percent of new life forms that evolved only one-tenth of one percent survived while all the rest are now extinct. --James L. Gould, Carol Grant Gould
It was the unique property of water with two hydrogen atoms each with a positive charge and one oxygen atom with a negative charge referred to as nonpolar molecules that allow weak electro static associations (hydrogen bonds). Their unique geometry allowed the self-repairing, bilayer membrane of the living cell. Modern cells protect themselves from the environment with bilayer membranes to which specific chemical doors and pumps have been added to help control molecular in-and-out traffic.
Hydrogen Cyanide, for example, is readily formed from ammonia and methane and then converted into the nucleotide adenine, which is also the backbone of ATP. –Chemical Evolution and the Origin of Life, By Richard E. Di ckerson; Scientific American, September, 1978
Many meteorites and comets contain abundant inorganically formed organic compounds. Natural selection must have been at work from the very onset, favoring liposomes with the most useful chemistry favoring those with the most useful building blocks and excluding those that might be toxic. At this point in time most organisms were autotrophs—that is, creatures that took energy or energy-rich materials from the nonliving world around them—as apposed to heterotrophs, which eat other organisms (you).
The next step in the evolution of living organisms was the development of cyclic photosynthesis—cyclic because the electron energized by an incoming photon from the sun is quickly returned to the chlorophyll molecule from which it came. Chlorophyll is embedded in a membrane along with the enzymes that steal the activated electron and harvest its energy; that energy is used to charge the membrane, and the electrostatic potential created is later employed to make ATP.
It takes about two photons to charge the membrane; enough to make one ATP, and since photons are free, life must suddenly have been released from dependence on inorganic nutrients synthesis: with photosynthesis! Suddenly there was enough ATP to generate nutrients from simple chemicals like carbon dioxide and ammonia!!! There are still bacteria that employ only cyclic photosynthesis.

There still wasn’t enough ATP available to store large supplies of sugars and starches to give evolution a much needed boost so nature invented the noncyclic process which created eight times more ATP than the cyclic process. In that process the electron energy is boosted in two steps, and so much extra charging and other work is wrung from its energy that eight ATP’s can be made from two activated electrons because the electron is not returned to the chlorophyll but is handed to an energy-storage molecule instead; the missing electron is obtained by splitting water, which generates oxygen as a waste product.
To put it another way, the electron end up in a multipurpose energy compound that can be used directly to power carbon fixation to charge the membrane for subsequent ATP production. The missing electron in the first chlorophyll is replaced with one obtained by splitting water, a process that liberates oxygen.
Most photoautotrophs (all true plants) use the more efficient noncyclic process with the eight-fold increase in energy production.
Because eight times more ATP was being produced by all the plants they were able to create more energy storage in the form of carbon-based, starches and sugars. The noncyclic process not only created more free oxygen it also allowed millions of other life forms to evolve to feed on the extra, eight-fold energy created by this process. This is why we have coal, oil and limestone on Earth plus myriads of other oxygen-breathing animals like Hillary Clinton.

--The Assembly of Cell Membranes by Mark S. Bretscher; Scientific American, October 1985
--The Photosynthetic Membrane by By Kenneth R. Miller Scientific American, October 1979
--Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis by Douglas C Youvan and Barry L. Marrs; Scientific American, June 1984
--Cytochrome C and the Evolution of Energy Metabolism, by Richard E. Dickerson, Scientific American, March 1980 Offprint 146
Me: Captain Hank Kroll